![]() Luckily we live in modern times that don’t require such hard work to get excellent results, and these libraries are here to prove this point.Įach developer carefully recorded and edited the samples so every producer, no matter if in a large studio or a basic home studio setup, can also showcase the best music possible. You had to assemble the players and record a specific song or score on the go in the past. ![]() ![]() However, not everyone can play these instruments or have them all gathered up at a studio. The sensitivity and warmth provided by such instruments played together are marvellous and used continuously throughout modern productions. No matter if a quartet, a duo, or even a solo instrument. The Miroslav refill when it's on sale is still the best.We’ve put effort and bringing you the best of the Kontakt libraries in 2024 dedicated for string instruments.įrom classical to pop music and from complex scores to a subtle passage in a song, string ensembles are guaranteed to elevate your track’s sonic quality. Sampling an orchestra takes a lot of time and money, and it's hard to find something that will really be useful and expressive and great-sounding without having to spend a bit on it. Otherwise, though, I rely on Kontakt libraries for all my string, brass, and woodwind needs nowadays. StringWerk is something of a one-trick pony (okay, a several-trick pony) but it's a pretty great-sounding several-trick pony and I use it very regularly. I can't recommend the ProjectSAM RE either (it's very, very limited), and Miroslav is an antique from the days when RAM was hard to come by, so its contents are as wide as the ocean but as shallow as a puddle. There are weird phasing artifacts on many of the samples that give them an undesirably "synthy" artificial sound, and if you're writing legato melodies you generally need to drown them in reverb to get anything that sounds vaguely realistic. I own the Euphonic Strings refill and I think I've used it exactly one time, ever. Sent from some crappy device using Tapatalk This style was not represented in the other libraries, so that’s the main reason I ended up with the Euphonics library.īut again, I use NI instruments in Reason now that I have access to them (but made some wonderful music with the Orkester/Miroslav/Euphonics libraries in the past). It’s not the plucked (pizzicato) sounds I’m talking about, it’s the spicato (“a bowing effect where the bow appears to bounce lightly on the strings”). i'm a former string player and i've browsed through em when i got the backline rig and they werent for me. If Selig uses it then it's definatley usable! As a whole though Europhic strings are quite cheesey and reverby imo. Reasonable man wrote:I havn't tried the pluck sound in Europhonic strings. I mix Stringwerk with (mostly) Reason cellos or Miroslav. ![]() You can also set the ranges of both in the combinator sothere only overlapping where you feel you want them to. But for the best possible combination i'd recommend looking at the combinator string patches (which are mostly nn-xt based) and throwing in a 6 2 line mixer and an instance of Stringwerk and balancing them. if your not doing pluck, id highly recommend Stringwerk. One patch in particular has a lovely cello'y' resonance (forget which one) that is ideal for low end. Sometimes people overlook or simply forget about the combinator patches in Reason under 'strings'. For that id suggest blending some of the single orchestra samples in Reason (with a very light blend layer of stringwerk for warmth). The drawback is it dosn't do single intruments very well. Stringwerk is the best ive ever heard or used. i'm a former string player and i've browsed through em when i got the backline rig and they werent for me.Īs belivable ensemble strings. I havn't tried the pluck sound in Europhonic strings.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |